NOTE: Both the M1 Pro and M1 Max have 10-core CPUs. Notice it’s running the latest version of macOS. Here’s the new system, with an M1 Pro CPU. However, I have not had any problem when using ffMPEG to read ProRes files and convert them into other formats for YouTube, my website or other social media. For this reason, they caution against using any software running ffMPEG for creating ProRes files. However, Apple has said that ffMPEG has reverse-engineered, rather than licensed, its ProRes implementation. Why did I choose ffWorks? Because, like Handbrake, its compression engine is ffMPEG, which is widely used in media software. However, none of the compressed files it created could be opened. NOTE: I originally wanted to use Handbrake for this test. There are lots of pretty charts here, but this is the short answer: regardless of the software you prefer to use, the M1 MacBook Pro makes encoding MUCH faster! Also in this article we will discover that compression speed is not dependent upon how hard the CPUs are working, nor how fast the hard disk transfers data. Here, too, I would expect compression speeds to be similar. As well, Adobe Premiere Pro uses the same compression engine for its exports that’s in Adobe Media Encoder. NOTE: Apple Final Cut Pro and Compressor use the same compression engine I would expect compression speeds to be similar. This is one of those articles that takes forever to create, yet can be understood in less than a minute. In this article, I compare the compression speed of Apple Compressor, Adobe Media Encoder (AME) and ffWorks (ffMPEG) on a new M1 MacBook Pro vs.
0 kommentar(er)
